Popular starting points

Loading the full XDC search index…

Developer hubBuild · PageFrom your first contract to your next application.Wallets & custodyDiscover · PageUnderstand the network. Find your place in it.Get XDCDiscover · PageUnderstand the network. Find your place in it.Run a nodeBuild · PageFrom your first contract to your next application.Ecosystem applicationsDiscover · PageUnderstand the network. Find your place in it.Post-quantum initiativeResearch · PageA clear view of the engineering ahead.
↑ ↓ to selectEnter to openEsc to close
Browse all resources →

Consensus & accountability

XDPoS 2.0

Delegated proof of stake, Byzantine fault tolerance and forensic accountability at the core of XDC Network.

On this page

The journey to decentralized trust

Blockchain systems allow participants to coordinate without depending on a single trusted intermediary. Bitcoin introduced a permissionless ledger; Ethereum added programmable smart contracts; proof-of-stake designs addressed resource use and scalability.

XDPoS 2.0 builds on this history with a focus on accountability. Its research asks not only when a blockchain remains secure, but how cryptographic records can identify malicious behavior when safety is violated.

The three pillars of XDPoS 2.0

Masternode election

Delegated proof of stake selects nodes that create and approve blocks. The documented consensus design uses a 108-member committee. Eligibility, stake and operational requirements determine participation; consult current node documentation before deployment.

HotStuff consensus

Rounds, leaders and voting rules organize Byzantine fault-tolerant agreement. Confirmed-block finality depends on the protocol’s assumptions about faulty committee members and network behavior.

Validator rewards

A reward mechanism encourages nodes to contribute to network operation. XDC’s consensus overview describes approximately six-second finalization; block production and transaction finality are different measurements.

Security with accountability

The consensus paper integrates accountability and forensic analysis into the blockchain record. The objective is to retain evidence that can attribute misconduct to participating actors.

Security claims have explicit assumptions. The HotStuff discussion describes safety when fewer than one-third of committee members are adversarial, alongside network conditions for progress. Operators should evaluate the current software, committee rules and monitoring requirements.

Why this design matters

Fast finalization

Transactions reach a defined final state without relying solely on probabilistic confirmation depth.

Byzantine fault tolerance

The protocol coordinates agreement even when some participants behave incorrectly, within its fault threshold.

Transparent accountability

Cryptographic evidence supports forensic investigation of consensus behavior.

Incentivized participation

Rewards encourage validators to maintain the network and contribute reliable infrastructure.

Read the consensus research

Accountability and Forensics in Blockchains: XDC Consensus Engine DPoS 2.0 was published in August 2021 by Gerui Wang, Jerome Wang, Liam Lai and Fisher Yu of Hash Laboratories.

Developer support

CodeRun.AI

AI-assisted technical support and development tools.

SOURCE & CONTEXT

Content carried forward from XinFin’s public website and linked primary sources. Historical material is identified where applicable.

Source record Editorial methodology